For example, the Canadian Psychological Association stated in that "parents' financial, psychological and physical well-being is enhanced by marriage and that children benefit from being raised by two parents within a legally-recognized union. Scientific research  has consistently shown that homosexual parents are just as effective as heterosexual parents, and the psychological well-being of children reared by same-sex couples is not worse than that of children raised by opposite-sex parents. As a private arrangement between consenting adults, they argue, there is no reason for state intervention. The legal answer is that, regardless of religion, when a discriminatory action is identified, Congress has the power by the Fourteenth Amendment to eradicate that evil. Same-sex parents and carers and their children are likely to benefit in numerous ways from legal recognition of their families, and providing such recognition through marriage will bestow greater benefit than civil unions or domestic partnerships. Recent studies have suggested that not only does legalizing marriage in an area generally make homosexual individuals in that area happier, it also makes them physically and mentally healthier and saves them money on health care. Most of the world religions have at some points in their histories opposed same-sex marriage for one or more of the following stated reasons: He has arrogantly acted against the Gospel that once made Britain 'great' and the lesson surely to be learned is that no man or men, however powerful, can mess with Almighty God with impunity and get away with it for everything a nation does is weighed on the scaled of divine approval or disapproval. While correlation is not causation — and the penalizing of bestiality is more due to demands from animal rights activists more than anything else — it is more than enough reason to assume that that slippery-slope doesn't work, as you don't see those same animal rights activists organizing protests in favor of the abolishing of same-sex marriage. These households, in turn, form the foundation of a productive society—a society in which, albeit incidentally, children, elders, and others who may be relatively powerless are likely to be protected. They often proscribed behaviours that other countries viewed as subject to moral, rather than legal, regulation. United States In the United States the question of whether couples of the same sex should be allowed to marry has roiled politics since at least Until now only one society in all of history practiced it, the Antediluvian. Barack Obama , who during his initial years in office had endorsed only civil unions for same-sex couples, in May became the first sitting U. This characterization is a deliberate legal and rhetorical strategy that builds upon the fact that, although marriage fits more neatly within the description of a "status," certain aspects of marriage - the fact of the couple's presentment to the community as a joined entity, as well as the personal expression qualities of engaging in a marital relationship - suggest that marriage can be defined at least partially as a type of conduct. Supreme Court building, Washington, D. For tables on same-sex marriage around the world, in the United States, and in Australia, see below.